Glad to see your ... thoughts and views are getting out to a larger audience Hmm, yes, it's been a very double-edged sword, that one. For reasons that it took me a whole evening to figure out, the article has been instrumentalised in a campaign against the Huddy break-up. It took naive me some time to comprehend that if one writes something that is critical of the writing process at House MD and then links it to an interview that is basically about the episode 'Bombshells', then most readers will automatically assume that one's criticism is aimed at the episode and its core feature, the House/Cuddy break-up. Since that wasn't my intention and I certainly had no desire to be involved in any sort of GY hate campaign I was slightly distressed. (More than slightly, actually. I have no idea how I'd be able to look the folks at House MD in the eyes if I were ever to meet them in RL.) Anyway, I've learned for the future.
As for the show, our rate of agreement is boringly high. There's nothing in what you said that I can use as the basis for a controversial discussion. Ah well, next time ...
no subject
Glad to see your ... thoughts and views are getting out to a larger audience
Hmm, yes, it's been a very double-edged sword, that one. For reasons that it took me a whole evening to figure out, the article has been instrumentalised in a campaign against the Huddy break-up. It took naive me some time to comprehend that if one writes something that is critical of the writing process at House MD and then links it to an interview that is basically about the episode 'Bombshells', then most readers will automatically assume that one's criticism is aimed at the episode and its core feature, the House/Cuddy break-up. Since that wasn't my intention and I certainly had no desire to be involved in any sort of GY hate campaign I was slightly distressed. (More than slightly, actually. I have no idea how I'd be able to look the folks at House MD in the eyes if I were ever to meet them in RL.) Anyway, I've learned for the future.
As for the show, our rate of agreement is boringly high. There's nothing in what you said that I can use as the basis for a controversial discussion. Ah well, next time ...